Glean vs Perplexity: AI Vendor Risk Comparison

Side-by-side risk comparison of Glean and Perplexity across 8 dimensions: data handling, IP exposure, jurisdiction, security, regulatory compliance, transparency, business stability, and dependency chain.

Glean
32.48 · moderate
HQ: United States · Founded 2019

Enterprise AI search platform that indexes and retrieves information across company applications (Slack, Drive, Confluence, etc.) with AI-powered answers, summaries, and knowledge management agents.

Perplexity
44.04 · elevated
HQ: United States · Founded 2022

AI-powered search engine that combines real-time web retrieval with large language models to deliver cited, conversational answers. Routes queries across multiple frontier models including Claude, GPT, and Gemini.

Risk dimensions side by side

Lower score = lower risk under TrustAtlas's default-balanced weight profile. The greener cell in each row is the lower-risk vendor for that dimension. How scoring works.

Dimension Glean Perplexity Delta
Data Handling 27.75 41.75 Glean -14.0
IP Exposure 26 60.5 Glean -34.5
Jurisdiction 12.5 12.5 Tied
Security 33.75 39.75 Glean -6.0
Regulatory Compliance 60 60 Tied
Transparency 60 70 Glean -10.0
Business Stability 41 26.75 Perplexity -14.3
Dependency Chain 27.97 36.33 Glean -8.4

Analyst summary

Glean

Glean is the leading enterprise AI search platform, with full tenant isolation, per-user permission enforcement that mirrors source systems, and deployment options that include private cloud. BYO-LLM support and multi-region residency make it the enterprise-safe answer to 'I want ChatGPT but over our own data.'

The default choice for large enterprises that need AI search with strict permission and residency controls.

Perplexity

Perplexity is a search-and-answer product that combines retrieval with multiple third-party LLMs. Dow Jones and NYP litigation over content scraping, opt-out-only training on user queries, and aggressive growth-over-governance posture all raise material concerns for enterprise adoption.

Useful tool for individual research, but not yet mature enough for enterprise-wide standardization.

Recent incident activity

Logged incidents 0 0

Incident counts are cumulative across the platform's history. See each vendor's profile for severity breakdown and source links.

This comparison uses the default-balanced weight profile. Different industries and use cases warrant different weights — healthcare buyers prioritize regulatory compliance, government buyers prioritize jurisdiction, legal buyers prioritize IP exposure. Build your own weights to see how the ranking shifts under your priorities.